Tom;

I wonder how this combination can work. Doesn't different database
mechanism for NetWorker 6.x make it impossible for a 6.x client to send
meaningful control information to a 5.2 server?

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Peacock, Tom wrote:

> It works just fine.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stan Horwitz [mailto:stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:05 AM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [Networker] Running Old version of Legato 5.5.2
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Sebastian, Didy wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > Environment
> > Windows NT4 w/sp6a
> > Legato 5.5.2 on backup server
> >
> >
> > We are in the process of building Windows 2000 servers and so I have been
> > installing the Legato 6.1.1.  Has anybody experienced any issues running
> > 6.1.1 on the client and 5.5.2 on the server.  Has anybody done any DR
> > testing using this config?
>
> This is not recommended and it probably won't even work because of the
> different database architectures that the two versions support.
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
>

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=