Hello Osvaldo,
usually I would agree - but this time not.
first is it is explicitly allowed from Legato,
second is, there is no 6.2 for Solaris. 6.2 is an Windows XP compatibility
release of 6.1.2
But one thing is for sure - never ever try to backup a 6.x client on a 5.x
Server
Johanes
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Osvaldo Lehmann [mailto:olehman AT AQB DOT CL]
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Oktober 2002 20:34
An: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Betreff: Re: [Networker] Strange numbers in savegroup report
I certainly would not do it. NEVER. Always run a higher server level. That's
a must
Osvaldo
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU]En
nombre de Marilyn Schultz
Enviado el: Viernes, 18 de Octubre de 2002 22:01
Para: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Asunto: Re: [Networker] Strange numbers in savegroup report
About two months ago I was told by Legato Tech Support that any combination
of 6.x clients and servers is acceptable, e.g. 6.0.2 server with 6.1.1
clients is OK. I don't have any experience with 6.2.
Hope this helps.
Marilyn Schultz
Mitchell International, Inc.
San Diego, CA
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Mussulman [mailto:mussulma AT CS.UIUC DOT EDU]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:52 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Strange numbers in savegroup report
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:43:06PM -0400, Terry Lemons wrote:
> But, could you run NetWorker V6.2 client software on your Windows XP
system,
> and run NetWorker V6.0.2 on your NetWorker server? As a general rule,
your
> NetWorker Server version should be equal to or greater than your NetWorker
> client/storage node version. But there are specific cases where Legato
has
> 'certified' this new-client-old-server to work. I sure wouldn't do it in
> any case that didn't have Legato's stamp of approval, though.
Thanks Terry. Unfortunately, 6.2 server appears to only be available on
Windows. My 6.0.2 server is running off of a Solaris box. Also, I have
many clients running Win XP and the 6.0.2 client and not getting this
error -- just a select few. I haven't narrowed it down to be Networker
or OFM yet. I was just asking here to see if anyone'd seen this.
But I am curious if anyone has any experience running 6.2 clients
against a 6.0.2 server.
Dave
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
