Re: [Networker] ready for writing, idle
2002-10-21 14:31:04
In regard to: Re: [Networker] ready for writing, idle, Robert Legate said...:
>I'm not exactly sure what your getting at with your message, however I do
>come across the "ready for writing, idle" message all the time on our
>DLT8000's. It usually indicates a hung drive and the problem can be
>fixed by executing the "fuser" command i.e # fuser /dev/rmt/0cbn where
>0cbn us your affected device. This gives you the pid of the process that
>has hung the drive and killing that process (kill -9 [pid] ) will un-hang
>it.
I've seen a few different people on the list in the last couple weeks
mention using `kill -9' on one or more NetWorker processes.
Everyone that's doing that is first trying the more "gentle" signals,
right? I mean -HUP and -TERM, likely in that order. Hopefully people
aren't going directly for `kill -9' in every situation, because that's
a horrible mistake, especially for a package that opens multiple databases
and may be modifying one or more of them when it gets the signal.
It also sometimes takes a few seconds for a process to respond to the
gentle signals, since the gentle signals allow it to execute any signal
handlers that it may have installed (think: database cleanup and proper
shutdown), and that may take a little while. Sometimes you need to move
up to using kill -KILL (aka -9), but you should always start with the
other signals first.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney mooney AT dogbert.cc.ndsu.NoDak DOT edu
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
|
|