Networker

Re: [Networker] Problem with depositing tapes

2002-08-23 05:38:40
Subject: Re: [Networker] Problem with depositing tapes
From: Davina Treiber <treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 05:41:40 -0400
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:45:23 +0200, Chris Madden <maddenca AT MYREALBOX DOT COM>
wrote:

>3) Specify the barcode being inserted and NetWorker will trust you; no
>inventory required and it will show properly in nsrjb immediately!
This is something I didn't know. Of course if NetWorker is trusting you,
you have to be sure that you can trust yourself. :-)

>I'd suggest you script something for deposits that uses the sjirdtag
command
>to discover what was where, and then deposits the tapes on a per barcode
>basis using the command syntax above.  Or, if doing deposits infrequently
>you could fill in the syntax above manually.  Lastly if you do only a few
>tape movements use the -v flag and take the time hit for the time to find a
>slot and inventorying but then you'll at least know what went where...

I think the -v method is more reliable than the sjirdtag method. The
problem with sjirdtag is that it often fails to deliver any output,
particularly if the jukebox is busy at the time. YMMV. It is fairly easy to
write a deposit script that parses the output of nsrjb -dv and inventories
only the slots that were deposited to. I have a script that does this, I'll
try to remember to post it over the weekend when I am using my other
machine.

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=