Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual autochanger
2016-10-02 12:47:32
On 2016-10-01 15:37, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> Will there be any problem in this case, if I try to simplify the conf files
> and drop away the "autochanger" and one of the two "storage devices" it
> refers to, and just had a single "storage device" per each media type?
Bacula's calim to support backup to disk is, let's say "optimistic",
without vchanger: https://sourceforge.net/projects/vchanger/
Either that or you have to define each filesystem as holding its own
"media type" and all that.
Note that you can still run concurrent backups and only serialize
writes: use a fast disk (SSD) for a spool device. And that if you back
up to commodity HDDs, you'll need to deal with disk failures: something
neither bacula nor vchanger will help you with.
Or you can rethink your requirements and back up to a single zfs. Then
bacula will work without any of those hoops and you can raidz your disks
against failures.
Dima
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|