Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Reducing the maximum number of volumes in a pool

2013-03-12 11:34:42
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Reducing the maximum number of volumes in a pool
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe.schuerkamp AT nionex DOT net>, Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>, Bacula Users Mailing List <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:31:51 -0400
> some more observations on reducing the numbers of volumes in a pool: I
> changed the max volumes from 14 to 8 for a disk based incremental
> pool, reloaded the director config and then started manually deleting
> volumes using bconsole.
>
> "list pool" still showed numvols = maxvols = 14 until I manually
> started the "update pool from resource" command, then the volume count
> for both numvols and maxvols would decrease by one for each volume
> deleted.
>
> Now I'm asking myself is this a bug or a feature? Sure bacula tries to
> keep my data as long as possible (which is nice), but I'd expect the
> following to happen:

I believe this is a feature.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester  
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the  
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to 
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>