Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] backup vs restore performance

2013-01-14 10:47:38
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup vs restore performance
From: Steve Thompson <smt AT vgersoft DOT com>
To: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:44:57 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, John Drescher wrote:

> I would say this is a combination of filesystem performance ( remember
> that when you backup there can be a lot of seeks that reduce
> performance) and decompression performance. Decompression is less CPU
> intensive than compression.

Ah yes, you're right. A gunzip on some test files is indeed 4-5 times 
faster than a gzip on the same data. I never noticed that big a difference 
before.

Steve

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>