Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: bacula possibly confused about label

2012-09-10 09:59:37
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: bacula possibly confused about label
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: Chris Ord <Chris.Ord AT digitalpictures.com DOT au>, bacula-users <Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:56:20 -0400
> Specifically the tape will probably have been removed without being rewound
> first.
> We use our tape robots for a variety of functions, ingesting data from
> clients, backups and archive cycles. This just has never come up before.
>

I am confused. You can not remove an LTO tape without rewinding. The
reason is LTO technology is a single reel on the tape and single reel
on the drive. If you removed the tape without rewinding the tape would
have been destroyed.


John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>