[Bacula-users] Concurrent jobs with and without spooling
2012-08-08 05:23:07
Hi all,
I have a question about data spooling in bacula.
If a job runs and write directly to tape without spooling (e.g. a Copy Job) and
pool "tape_full" on storage "autochanger1" (two tape drives) and a second job
is started with spooling (e.g. Backup Job) and pool "tape_full" on storage
"autochanger1". What happens when the second job begin despooling? Will the
despooling still have exculsive access described in [1] or will the two jobs
write concurrently to the same tape drive and mixed the backup data on the
volume?
Job 1:
Type: Copy
Spool Data: no
Pool: tape_full
Storage: autochanger1
Job 2:
Type: Backup
Spool Data: yes
Pool: tape_full
Storage: autochanger1
Thanks,
- Jummo
[1] http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Data_Spooling.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Bacula-users] Concurrent jobs with and without spooling,
Jummo <=
|
|
|