I added three new jobs, two new pools and one fileset. But I kept that one job 
as it was. I checked and noticed the last incremental backup failed due to an 
error of the autochanger. Could that be the reason? How does bacula determine 
what it has to do? I would have thought a failed job should just mean twice as 
much to save the next day.

Henrik


Henrik Zawischa
Senior System Engineer



SONIC Performance Support GmbH
Wandsbeker Königstraße 19 - D22041 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 300 600 34
Fax: +49 40 300 600 18
E-Mail: Henrik.Zawischa AT sonic-ps DOT de
Web: www.sonic-performance-support.com

Facebook: www.facebook.com/SONICVideoTraining
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/SONICVideoTraining
Twitter: www.twitter.com/VideoTraining

 ________________________________________
Von: John Drescher [drescherjm AT gmail DOT com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Mai 2012 18:03
Bis: Henrik Zawischa - SONIC Performance Support
Cc: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Last full backup not found

> I have a strange phenomenon: though there is definitely a full backup, a
> job set to incremental claims there weren’t and wants to run a full backup.
> Very unfortunate, as the tapes needed are not in place. Any idea how I could
> find out what went wrong?
>

Did you modify the job or fileset since the last full backup?

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users