On 14.04.2012 13:26, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> Yes, I know that the Bacula Release Notes say "As always, both the Director
> and Storage daemon must be upgraded at the same time."
>
> Is this because of some shared library versions or something else "single
> host environment"- related?
>
> I'm migrating my old CentOS 5.x-32 system with Bacula 5.0.3, to CentOS
> 6.2-64, with Bacula 5.2.6.
>
> I'm very tempted to have an intermediate step (for just a few days) with
> the old storage (running in the old hw) and the new director (in the new
> hw).
>
> So both the director and storage would be of 5-generation with different
> minor numbers, and everything running in any single host, would be of
> exactly the same version.  Any chance this combination might work?
>
> Of course, as long as I had that cocktail in use, I wouldn't touch the conf
> files for no other reason but to edit machine names where necessary. So no
> attempt to use any new features... if the communication protocols between
> the daemons haven't changed, I guess there shouln't be anything
> wrong -unless the daemons explicitly check the version info.
Hi.

Why would you like to have different versions of DIR and SD installed on 
the same machine?

--
Silver

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users