Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualBackup

2012-04-11 06:06:03
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualBackup
From: Xabier Elkano <xelkano AT hostinet DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:03:37 +0200
El 04/04/12 11:36, Geert Stappers escribió:
> > I'm trying to make a Virtual backup of a machine that I already backed-up 
> > with a base backup and a full backup after.
> > 
> > The problem is that the backup's size of the virtual backup is the same of 
> > the full backup. Witch tell us that it is not taking the base for doing the 
> > Virtual Backup.
> > 
> > Has anybody tried it successfully? Base+full = Virtual
Hi,

A virtual backup is a process to consolidate all incrementals and get a
new Full backup from the latest full backup +incrementals. It must have
similar size to a full backup. The difference is that you get a full
backup on the bacula server rather than on client.

regards

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second 
resolution app monitoring today. Free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>