[Bacula-users] Bacula and ZFS

Subject:

From:

Gabriele Bulfon <gbulfon AT sonicle DOT com>

To:

bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net

Date:

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 21:18:52 +0200 (CEST)

I understand this may sound a bit wary, but: what are the benefits of using Bacula on a ZFS storage
rather than using Amanda or ZFS send bare utilities?

I know Bacula supports ZFS acls, but we also understand the faster option of zfs sending.
We also know zfs sending is not optimal for single file data recovery.

So, what is the status of Bacula with ZFS snapshots? How it compares to other solutions?

Thanks :)
Gabriele.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup-To-Files / Multiple Concurrent Jobs, John Drescher

Next by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup-To-Files / Multiple Concurrent Jobs, Tim Gustafson

Previous by Thread:

[Bacula-users] Backup-To-Files / Multiple Concurrent Jobs, Tim Gustafson

Next by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and ZFS, Chris Hoogendyk

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]