Re: [Bacula-users] Why doesn't Bacula use the whole tape?
2011-06-10 11:39:32
2011/6/10 "Stefan Günther" <prolinux AT web DOT de>:
> Hello,
>
> we are use an Autochanger with 8 Ultrium-LTO 3 tapes: seven for everyday and
> the last one is a cleaning tape
> +---------+------------+-----------+---------+-----------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+--------------+---------------------+
> | MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes | VolFiles |
> VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType | LastWritten
> |
> +---------+------------+-----------+---------+-----------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+--------------+---------------------+
> | 20 | TestVol1 | Full | 1 | 223,467,181,056 | 224 |
> 604,800 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Ultrium-LTO3 | 2011-06-10 12:04:53 |
> +---------+------------+-----------+---------+-----------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+--------------+---------------------+
>
> TestVol1 belongs to a pool where we defined "Maximum Volumes Bytes = 0".
>
> Nevertheless Bacula complains that it needs a new volume:
>
> 10-Jun 12:06 bacula-sd JobId 106: Job Storage08.2011-06-10_09.14.16_23 is
> waiting. Cannot find any appendable volumes.
> Please use the "label" command to create a new Volume for:
> Storage: "Drive-1" (/dev/st0)
> Pool: TestPool
>
>
> Any idea what's going wrong?
>
Are these LTO3 or LTO2 tapes?
When bacula hits any kind of tape error it assumes the tape is full.
Check your dmesg.
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|