Op 03-05-11 16:05, Josh Fisher schreef:
> On 5/3/2011 5:55 AM, Koenraad Lelong wrote:
>> ...
>
> So, bacula:bacula cannot write, but bacula:disk can, yet all accessed
> directories appear to be owned by bacula:bacula? What group does the
> bacula-sd daemon run as? On Fedora, it is typical for bacula-dir to run
> as bacula:bacula, while bacula-sd runs as bacula:disk. Perhaps this is
> an selinux thing? Maybe the simple solution is to change everything to
> be owned by bacula:disk and run bacula-sd as bacula:disk.
>
Hi,
I got a step further.
Since I didn't know which user/group bacula was running as, pa aux
showed only bacula-binaries running as root. So I tried to force the
group to disk in the startup-script. I didn't see any difference, I
forced the user in the startup-script. Then I saw bacula-sd running as
bacula.
Then I tried "barcode labels" in bconsole, this time with success.
I'm using OpenSuse 11.4 to do my tests. Since there is no "official"
package of bacula I had to download a contributed package. After
installing the package I saw a file where it seemed bacula-sd was
compiled with user and group bacula/bacula. So this is not the case I think.
My only problem now I that I can't eject the disk with the button (after
the autofs timeout). Something is using the disk, and I can't find what.
lsof didn't show anything was using the disk. "eject /dev/sdb1" did
eject the disk though.
Now I have to study again to see how to use the setup.
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Koenraad.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
