Re: [Bacula-users] incremental backups too large
2011-01-13 07:49:05
2011/1/12 Lawrence Strydom <qholloi AT gmail DOT com>:
> This leads me
> to believe that the entire file is being backed up instead of only the
> changed data which is my understanding of a differential backup.
The only program I know that work in that way is rdiff-backup.
It's very efficent in saving sapce but you do now have something
centralized like bacula director and it uses much more cpu.
On windows it's not so easy to implement. It might have issues with
non ascci character in file names.
Recently it has been created a gui
http://www.nongnu.org/jbackpack/downloads.html.
Did you enable compression in bacula file set?
This is going to save some space. (compression = GZIP)
Example:
FileSet {
Name = "my-fileset"
Include {
Options {
signature = MD5
compression = GZIP
}
File = "e:\\"
}
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
Re: [Bacula-users] incremental backups too large,
Valerio Pachera <=
|
|
|