Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula writing to wrong volume

2011-01-12 17:05:37
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula writing to wrong volume
From: Arunav Mandal <dibun AT hotmail DOT com>
To: <heitor AT bacula.com DOT br>, <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:02:50 +0100
All 5 tapes were new and never being written.
 
Arunav.
 
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:27:18 -0300
> From: heitor AT bacula.com DOT br
> To: drescherjm AT gmail DOT com; dibun AT hotmail DOT com
> CC: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula writing to wrong volume
>
> On 01/12/2011 05:14 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> > 2011/1/12 Arunav Mandal<dibun AT hotmail DOT com>:
> >> I am using Bacula 5.0.3 and I have five tape named LTO-001 to LTO-005. After
> >> LTO-001 is full bacula is selecting up tape in random and not LTO-002.
> >>
> >> How can I force bacula to go by serially when selecting tapes? I started up
> >> all five new tapes marked as Append.
> >>
> > You really can not force bacula to go in any order without a lot of
> > work on your part. I believe bacula chooses tapes in order of mediaid
> > when there are several new ones to choose from.
> >
> Bacula chooses the tape to write from a number of variables (e.g.: last
> time written, volume status, etc.).
> Force Bacula to write on a specific volume is irrelevant, since catalog
> contains all association about stored files x volumes.
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand 
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you 
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users