Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line

2011-01-08 04:51:15
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Slow backup even with a dedicated line
From: Mister IT Guru <misteritguru AT gmx DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 09:46:11 +0000
On 07/01/2011 14:53, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> On 07/01/11, Oliver Hoffmann (oh AT dom DOT de) wrote:
>> I do full backups at the weekend and it just takes too long. 12h or so.
>> bacula does one job after the other and I have a max. transfer rate of
>> 11 to 12 MBytes/second due to the 100Mbit connection.
>>
>> For testing purpose I connected one client via crosslink (1Gbit on
>> both sides) to the server. But I still have the same transfer rate. Why
>> is that?
> What sort of backups are you doing? Are you writing to tape? Are you
> using spooling?
>
I am new(ish) to bacula, how does spooling speed up jobs, I have noticed 
similar issues, but because the same behavior appeared on three 
instances I've built recently. I'm very interested to learn how to 
improve performance.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company
that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web.   Learn how to 
best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure 
and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users