Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Backups - Do we actually need full backups anymore?

2011-01-07 06:39:27
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Backups - Do we actually need full backups anymore?
From: Mister IT Guru <misteritguru AT gmx DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 11:36:52 +0000
On 07/01/2011 11:19, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2011, Graham Keeling wrote:
>
>>> Thank you for the clarification! That's what I thought before hand.
>>> *phew* otherwise my backup plans would be fubard! Why do you say, "may
>>> involve" creating a new volume?
>> Because, depending on what bacula feels like doing, it may append to or 
>> recycle
>> an existing volume.
> Bacula does many things, but I don't think it "feels".  What you may mean
> is
>       "depending on what bacula is configured to do, it may append to or
>       recycle an existing volume".
>
> :-)
>
> Gavin
>
Gavin, I like your correction here! With what I've been putting my 
bacula daemons through, if they could feel anything, they'd walk out on me.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company
that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web.   Learn how to 
best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure 
and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>