Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi, Joseph.
> 
> On Thursday, 12 August 2010 20:00:29 +0000,
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> 
> > I've been following this thread in hopes of uncovering the reason why
> > the op would even compile himself for a platform that has precompiled
> > binaries available (lets forgo the obvious argument for destroying a
> > package managed Cadillac OS in the first place) and I haven't seen it
> > appear?
> 
> > Why the need to endure all this pain in the first place? Even if
> > compile time options needed to be changed, wouldn't it be
> > easier/smarter/faster/lighter/shinier to modify the spec and rebuild?
> 
> I'm compiling Bacula because after searching on the official
> repositories of CentOS 5.5, I did not find precompiled binaries. Luckily
> I was able to solve this problem, although in the past days I was busy
> with other things and so I could not continue with this thread.
> 

Pre-compiled binaries are offered through Fedora Project's EPEL repository, 
for which you can find the necessary information on:

  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users