Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] suggestion to have a different file retention period for verify jobs

2010-08-12 09:01:31
Subject: [Bacula-users] suggestion to have a different file retention period for verify jobs
From: "Marcel Gsteiger" <Marcel.Gsteiger AT milprog DOT ch>
To: <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:29:18 +0200
Hi all

I have a problem with bacula deleting files from verify initdb jobs (i am using 
version 5.0.2-1 on CentOS 5.5 x86_64).

AFAIK, the file retention period can only be defined on the client resource. 
Moreover, bacula strictly purges all database entries after the retention 
period has expired, regardless of their origin (normal backup job or verify 
initdb job).

It would be desirable to keep all entries (or, at least, have different 
retention periods) for database entries that belong to "verify initdb" jobs. As 
bacula works now, these initdb jobs get lost, and the next verify job gives 
lots of "new file" messages - hence it essentially reports failure without 
reason.

The fileset of my verify job is not very large, so keeping these entries 
somewhat longer than ordinary files would not be a space problem (since these 
files are contained in each backup anyway).

Is this a known problem, or is there already a solution?

Regards
--Marcel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Bacula-users] suggestion to have a different file retention period for verify jobs, Marcel Gsteiger <=