Hi,

Please disregard this thread. Bacula is doing everything right. 
Everything started with the summary showing compression rate equals zero 
and the final fd bytes just a bit bigger than the sum of the file 
sizes... Now that I have disabled compression completely I've noticed 
that the encryption overhead is much larger than I thought it would be.

Sorry to disturb you,
Gustavo.

Gustavo Gibson da Silva wrote:
> Gustavo Gibson da Silva wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I have a bacula 5.0.2 setup that uses compression based on file 
>> compression and it is working fine. Now I've decided to play with 
>> encryption and I have just noticed that the files are no longer 
>> compressed. Are encryption and compression mutually exclusive or do I 
>> need another setup in order to make it work?
>>
> Argh,
>
> I Mean that the bacula setup decides to use compression based on the 
> file extension. Sorry for the mistake.
>
> TIA,
>
> Gustavo.
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Gustavo.
>>
>
>


-- 
"Nam et ipsa scientia potestas est"

        -- Sir Francis Bacon, 1597


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users