>>>>> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:15:35 +0200, Foo  said:
> 
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:06:43 +0200, Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT 
> com>
> wrote:
> 
> > I suggest checking your current db version by
> > select * from version;
> 
> Version 10.
> 
> Is Bacula 2.4.4 dir/sd compatible with a newer database layout (11, 12,
> whatever?) or do I need to update the dir/sd executables at the same time?

They are incompatible so you must do it at the same time.  I suggest making a
dump of the database first, because there is no way to undo the update
scripts.


> > and then running the appropriate scripts from the updatedb directory of  
> > the source code (not the compiled packages) and then the one from 5.0.1  
> > (which is not the updatedb directory).
> 
> I see some .in files which look like template scripts, I presume I need to
> 'make' before these are filled in?

I think you need to run configure with the appropriate args, rather than make.

It might be easier to do it by hand, replacing @SQL_BINDIR@ and @db_name@ by
the appropriate values (something like /usr/bin and bacula).

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users