The problem is certainly in version 3.0.3. In version 3.0.2 this problem
does not happen.
John, I'm sure the problem is not in the database. The job that I
perform, the bacula-dir shows me running, but not running on the
bacula-sd and not in the bacula-fd too.
John Drescher escreveu:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Gustavo Nunes Freire Ribeiro
> <gustavo AT linconet.com DOT br> wrote:
>
>> Hello Mehma,
>>
>> I've done these 2 tests:
>>
>> I commented out messages section and still going the same problem. Guilt
>> bstmp's really not because I am not using it.
>>
>> I had restarted the bacula-dir after running the first job and it runs
>> the first job, when I run the second job it
>> simply stop. When I ask the status of the bacula-dir, it shows that the
>> job is running, but when I check in bacula-sd and bacula-fd does not
>> there is no job running. Sorry my english =)
>>
>>
>
> How long have you waited? Was there activity on the database server? A
> job will end on the FD side but still be running on the director for
> sometimes several minutes. The reason is it may take a long time to
> despool the database entries.
>
> John
>
>
--
Gustavo N. F. Ribeiro
Analista de Redes
LINCONET Soluções em Informática LTDA
+55 84 9996-3582
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
