Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Possibility of parallelising encryption?

2010-04-07 15:33:14
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Possibility of parallelising encryption?
From: Richard Scobie <richard AT sauce.co DOT nz>
To: Craig Ringer <craig AT postnewspapers.com DOT au>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:30:59 +1200
Craig Ringer wrote:

Snip interesting crypto discussion...

>> I'd use the hardware encryption (which presumably has no performance
>> impact), that is an option on this autochanger, except they want $2500
>> for it...
>
> Probably because it has a custom ASIC for the crypto algorithm in use to
> allow it to go fast enough.

Well, I suspect the ASIC is already onboard - the $2500 seems to get you 
a couple of USB keys to enable it (HP MSL series libraries).

> The trouble with this is that if your tape drive/changer dies, you
> generally need another one with the same hardware crypto to restore.
> This is a really, really ugly situation for disaster recovery.

As long as you obtain another MSL library and use one of your original 
USB keys, you're back in business, but I take your point.

Regards,

Richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users