Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Overhead of incremental backup ???

2010-02-14 23:45:04
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Overhead of incremental backup ???
From: haridas n <haridas.nss AT gmail DOT com>
To: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:12:15 +0530
Hi,

Thank you for your replay.


If there is  any problem while we modify the fileset options by adding this accurate=yes ,like the bacula will consider the file set has been changed and it will take full backup of that file-set next time ?

Regards,
Haridas N.


On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:36:36 +0530, haridas n said:
>
> Hi ,
>
> I'm Using bacula 3.0.3 for to backup number of servers,in which some servers
> got lot of data around >110 GB .So due to the lack of space in the backup
> server to constantly  maintain a backup for more than one month period, I
> forced to remove the differential backup from the schedule and now it take
> only full and incremental backup for all my serves (one month cycling).
>
> This is the schedule for this month period for all the clients.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 2010-01-24 23:55 : mail.net-pool (Full)
> 2010-01-27 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-01-31 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-02-03 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-02-07 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-02-10 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-02-14 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-02-17 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-02-21 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-02-24 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-02-28 23:55 : mail.net-pool (Full)
> 2010-03-03 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-03-07 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-03-10 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-03-14 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-03-17 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-03-21 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
> 2010-03-24 02:05 : mail.net-pool (Incremental)
>
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Now I have one doubt about, if we increase the number of incremental
> backups this would have any problem to the backup time.I need only for
> one month period for my clients. So please help me to know more about this ..

Incremental backup saves less data so it should be faster than differential
backup in general.  Restoring might be slower because it has to read more
jobs.

Also, look at using the accurate=yes fileset option (to track deleted/renamed
files) because that is more likely to happen for incremental backups.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users



--
Have a nice day.......
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>