Scott Courtney wrote:
>I'd like to suggest that the spec file created during this process
>should be renamed from bacula.spec to bacula-5.0.0.spec, because in my
>case I was trying to keep an existing Bacula 3.0.3 build intact.

That's not the way you're supposed to do things with rpm.  There are a few 
things that you're not supposed to do in rpm which would be quite convenient - 
and several more that rpm does which would be better done in other ways.  But 
this isn't the list to discuss that :-)


Moray.
"To err is human.  To purr, feline"





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users