Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to understand block sizes.

2010-01-11 10:21:09
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to understand block sizes.
From: Brian Debelius <bdebelius AT intelesyscorp DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:14:29 -0500
I think I figured out why I am now only able write a maximum 512K block 
size now.  Its hardware compression being enabled.  When I did my 
earlier tests, I had it turned off.


On 1/7/2010 10:01 AM, Brian Debelius wrote:
> I am just trying to understand things, so please bear with me.  I 
> understand that the recommended block size is 256K.
>
> I thought that earlier this week, I tested the LTO-3 drive with a 1M 
> block size.  But attempting to do so again, does not work.  So now it 
> looks like the actual maximum block size for the drive is 
> 512M(524288).  So now my questions.
>
> #dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/nst1 bs=524288 count=1
> This completes successfully.
>
> If I set the Maximum Block Size = 524288 in the sd, and run btape test,
> This fails.  Why?
>
> If I set the Maximum Block Size = 523264 (1024 less) in the sd,  and 
> run btape test,
> This succeeds.  Why?
>
> If I round this block size to a 4096 division, it would be 520192.
> If I set the Maximum Block Size = 520192 in the sd, and run btape test,
> This succeeds, but it says it is using a 520092 block size  Why?
>
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>