Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work

Subject:

From:

mehma sarja <mehmasarja AT gmail DOT com>

To:

bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net

Date:

Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:53:26 -0700

Thanks Martin,

You have put a good closure on the quest for knowledge. If I upgrade Bacula, will I have to upgrade the database? Meaning do I have to run those update table scripts. I am on postgresql version 8.29.

Yudhvir

OK, this shows why it is slow. The algorithm in add_findex is only efficient
when called with consecutive index values (the third number printed).

The code for "restore all" in 2.4.4 doesn't do that, so it can take a very
long time to complete. This was fixed in later version, so I think the best
solution is to upgrade Bacula.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Bacula-users] Last call: Invitation in Berlin, Arno Lehmann

Next by Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work, Martin Simmons

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work, Martin Simmons

Next by Thread:

Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring large directory does not work, Martin Simmons

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]