Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] premature EOT under Windows

2009-06-16 11:02:07
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] premature EOT under Windows
From: Matthias Reif <mattreif AT spseed.com DOT au>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:38:40 +1000
James,

Interesting. I have been experiencing exactly the same problem the last two 
nights. However, my bacula-sd and -dir are running on a x64 CentOS 5.2 box. The 
bacula-fd involved in the error runs on x64 Windows 2k8. I also run bacula-fds 
on other Linux and FreeBSD hosts, which don't show the same issues. However, 
the size of the Windows fileset is the largest with approx. 110 GB.

I am using Bacula 3.0.1 together with an HP LTO3 drive.

Thanks
Matthias


-----Original Message-----
From: James Harper <james.harper AT bendigoit.com DOT au>
Sent: Tuesday, 16 June 2009 11:27 PM
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net <bacula-users AT 
lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Subject: [Bacula-users] premature EOT under Windows

I've been using bacula-sd and bacula-dir under windows for a bit and so far 
it's worked well except for two occasions. Just now, and maybe a week ago, 
bacula decided that it had reached the end of tape (I think there was an error 
there). This happened again shortly after, but the problem appeared to go away 
after restarting bacula-sd. When it happened a week ago, I put it down to a 
problem with Windows updates which were installing or had just finished 
installing when the backup job was running.

So to restate what I just said:
. backup-sd says end of tape due to write error (about 83G into the job) . I 
cancel the job, purge the volume, and restart using the same volume . bacula-sd 
does the same again, but not at the same point
. I cancel the job, purge the volume, restart bacula-sd, and restart the job 
using the same volume again
. the backup works fine, and subsequent backups worked fine for a week or so.

I'm using bacula 3.0.1 (x64 version of bacula-fd, i386 version of everything 
else). The drive is a HP LTO3 drive (400/800G capacity). The normal job size is 
about 220G.

Windows reports no errors in the logs (eg no scsi errors). I have run HP L&TT 
tools and it declares that everything is fine, although I haven't run it since 
the most recent failure.

Is anyone else using bacula-sd under windows and can tell me what their 
experience is? Given the "unsupported" disclaimer for -sd and -dir under 
windows, I'm not ruling out a bug in -sd...

Thanks

James



------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited 
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing  server 
and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>