Hi 

Just need some clarification really. 
Have old Debian Sarge box, which need to be backed up. Now, directors I have 
are 2.4 or 3.0, with plans of migration to 3.0 all around. Debian box however 
have bacula client 1.36 in sarge archives. As it is only client, I would 
preffer to use distro packages, even if this gives me nothing in terms of 
manageability, as sarge is virtualy dead now. 
Now, director 3.0 gives me authentication error on connection. I've checked 
that names and password are correct. I'm assuming communication issue between 
1.36 fd and 3.0 director. Am I right ?? Or such configuration is possible and I 
did typo (however, copy-pasted all details in config) ?? 

-- 
Piotr Gbyliczek
Second Line Support 
Forlinux LTD

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

The information contained in this message or any of its attachments maybe
confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s).
Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use 
of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission
of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual
and not necessarily those of ForLinux Limited.

ForLinux Limited email is for business use only.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users