Hello Craig,


Craig Ringer wrote:
> 
> Hi all
> 
> I'm wondering if there's any way to limit the memory used by `accurate'
> mode -  say, by spooling the required data to an mmap()ped file instead
> of an in-memory block, or handling it in chunks.
> 

Not at this time, mmap isn't portable and it costs too much (you can do it
yourself by adding an other swap area). We've planed a big memory
improvement in a future release.


Craig Ringer wrote:
> 
> I just had a server with 2GB of RAM, most of which was free, go OOM
> because Bacula ate 1.5GB of RAM and 2GB of swap during an incremental,
> so I'm a bit concerned about this.
> 

How many files have you on this server ?

Bye

PS: maybe you have already see my answer, something goes wrong with my first
reply
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/OOM-with-%60accurate%27-mode-tp23331784p23402336.html
Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users