On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Andriy Bandos <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, did not get that.
No problem. I know this is difficult to explain. Probably my fault here.

> Here is the specific example I asked about:
>
> user=30, md=5, case=6, reading=0;
> There are two abnormalities (calc + mass) and three marks on each view (CC
> and MLO).
> One mark on each view corresponded to the calc-abnormality, and two marks
> were "extra". Both "extra" marks and calc-abnormality on MLO-view have
> Image=82, Cor_image=4; and both "extra" marks and calc-abnormality on
> CC-view have Image=4, Cor_image=82.
> So, to match there observations for two views additional (to
> "Image"-"Cor_Image") information should be used. I thought you were using
> "Mark" variable to complete matching, is it true?
> Thanks.
>

Do you know the target size for this case? I am not sure what Amy sent you.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users