Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Another strangeness on 2.4.4 - upgrading to FULL after FULL backup

2009-01-08 07:34:10
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Another strangeness on 2.4.4 - upgrading to FULL after FULL backup
From: Silver Salonen <silver AT ultrasoft DOT ee>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:34:12 +0200
On Thursday 08 January 2009 13:21:50 John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Frank Altpeter <frank.altpeter AT gmail DOT 
> com> 
wrote:
> > My bad, just detected it by myself... the FileSet has been modified
> > and so I assume the Incremental backup has been upgraded to Full
> > because the FileSet has been changed.
> >
> > But IMHO there should be a better notification for that, something
> > like "FileSet has been modified, upgrading to FULL backup".
> >
> >
> 
> I think there is a way to have fileset changes not force a full. Check
> the docs if anyone does not reply with the instructions.
> 
> John

To my mind that wasn't a question at all - he just notices that it was because 
of that (and there was nothing wrong with it), and made a suggestion for 
improving notice.

The suggestion is quite useful to my mind and it should be made into a correct 
"project" to make it official :)

--
Silver

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It is the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users