Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Timing problems with backups

2009-01-03 14:42:42
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Timing problems with backups
From: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
To: marvinoid AT yahoo DOT com
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:39:57 -0500
Apple Jack wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> I am experiencing a problem, where when I backup my nas the job takes so long 
> that by the time the backup finishes, a new job is already scheduled as a 
> full backup.
> To make thins clear:
> 1. Schedule daily Incremental job for the NAS.
> 2. The job starts, says it will perform a full backup.
> 3. The next job gets again scheduled as a full backup, since the previous one 
> is still running I suppose? So if it finishes in the end, a new full backup 
> of my 1.5TB of data is started.
> 
> It's not a huge problem of course, but maybe it should be fixed? Problem is 
> that by the time I notice it has started over again there is already a lot of 
> tape waisted on the second, redundant job.

There is code in the repository for this.  Look for duplicate job 
control.  It will be in the next release (I believe).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>