> Robert Du Gaue wrote:
>> I second this. Something like a LIMITBANDWIDTH keyword,
>> specifically to prevent a link from being saturated. Either at the
>> director level or storage level (too allow for links with dedicated
>> nics full thru-put) Good suggestion.
> 
> There are many tools available to limit bandwidth.  We are a backup 
> project.  Let's leave network throttling to other projects.  There
> are many solutions, more than enough for each platform we support.
> 
> We don't have enough coders to manage the existing list of features
> let along take on tasks that are clearly outside the scope of
> backups.

Maybe you are right, although IMHO I wouldn't say that shaping traffic
in an application that is very bandwidth demanding is outside the scope
of it.

I think it would be a nice feature for a wishlist :)

Regards,
Carlos Velasco

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users