Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to have this configuration

2008-05-16 11:08:43
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to have this configuration
From: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: "Reynier Perez Mira" <rperezm AT uci DOT cu>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:03:02 -0400
> I'm asking if is possible to have this Bacula configuration? I mean the 
> Director, Console, Storage and Client in the same machine as primary backup 
> server and Director,Console,Storage in a secondary backup server? See the 
> picture for more details 
> http://img516.imageshack.us/my.php?image=diagramasipp60402008engxx8.png
> Cheers and thanks in advace
> Ing. Reynier Pérez Mira

Although in the past (4 years ago or more with bacula 1.36) I have had
2 directors with one database the devs tell me this is not
recommended. Other than that you can have as many storage daemons as
you want.

John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>