On Tue, 6 May 2008, Ralf Gross wrote:

> Steve Thompson schrieb:
>> Ah, I had thought of that. No, it isn't. I force a full backup, it runs to
>> completion, and then the incremental starts some time later, and is always
>> upgraded to a full. I have done several different bacula installations,
>> and it happens like this on all of them. On one setup, I have 50 backup
>> jobs, and I certainly haven't tested all fifty of them this way, but the
>> half dozen or so that I have tested all do this.
>>
>> Also, if the director happens to be down when a full backup is scheduled,
>> and the next run, when the scheduled backup is an incremental, does not do
>> the missing full while the previous full is still in the database.
>
> The org. poster had the problem that he is using differnt jobs for
> full and incremental backup levels. This is not the way bacula works.
>
> Are you using one job for full/diff/inc backup or do you have
> different jobs for each backup level?

One job.

-s

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users