--- On Mon, 5/5/08, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] increment backup upgraded to full backup even 
though full backup was performed.
To: hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com
Cc: "baculausers" <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Monday, May 5, 2008, 11:40 AM

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Hemant Shah <hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
>   Last weekend I tested by bacula setup. I had setup a fullbackup to tape,
> and another full backup to disk, after the full backups were finished I
> started schedule for incremental backup. All of my backups were upgraded
to
> a full backup.
>
Did you change the fileset at all between the last full backup?

John


No. I only changed the time for the incremental backup in bacula-dir.conf file 
and then ran reload command in bconsole. In my file set resource I have set 
"Ignore Fileset Changes" to yes, so even if I had changed it, it should not 
have been upgraded to full backup.

Hemant Shah
E-mail: hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com



      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users