* Arno Lehmann schrieb am 27.04.08 um 23:25 Uhr:
> Hi,
> 
> 27.04.2008 22:35, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > * Arno Lehmann schrieb am 27.04.08 um 17:33 Uhr:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>> I guess either this is a bug in bacula or its documentation or the
> >>> concurrent jobs feature is not about eally running jobs in parallel
> >>> and bacula does not support this feature at all (yet).
> >> Hardly. Look here:
> > 
> > ok, thanks Arno.
> > 
> > Do these jobs use a different Scheduling?
> 
> Well, in the case I showed these jobs were all started manually (by 
> feeding bconsole with the proper commands), but usually they use the 
> same schedule and still run in parallel.

OK thanks. I was wondering if it *may* be possible that jobs will
not in parallel if they use different schedules. But as you did
start them manually it shows that using the same scheduling is not
mandatory.

Thanks
-Marc
-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|              --> http://www.links2linux.de <--                   |
|                                                                  |
+---Registered-Linux-User-#136487------------http://counter.li.org +

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users