Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental upgraded to full?

2008-04-24 13:35:06
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental upgraded to full?
From: Steve Thompson <smt AT vgersoft DOT com>
To: Hemant Shah <hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:19:27 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Hemant Shah wrote:

> Last night I ran the backup cycle, bacula did the full backup and 
> immediately tried to do the incremental backup. Instead of doing 
> incremental backup it upgraded it to a full backup. Why did it upgrade 
> to a full backup if full backup was done right before it started 
> incremental?

Besides this, I have noticed (for every version since 1.38), that if a 
full backup is run manually (via bconsole), then the next occurrence of a 
backup for the same job always repeats the full backup, even if the 
scheduled backup was incremental.

Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Thompson                 E-mail:      smt AT vgersoft DOT com
Voyager Software LLC           Web:         http://www DOT vgersoft DOT com
39 Smugglers Path              VSW Support: support AT vgersoft DOT com
Ithaca, NY 14850
   "186,300 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users