Re: [BackupPC-users] Block-level rsync-like hashing dd? recommend xfs/lvm
2011-04-11 11:20:12
Tod Detre wrote at about 09:53:57 -0400 on Monday, April 11, 2011:
> For backing up my BackupPC pool I've found that using xfs on top of
> lvm to be a great solution.
>
> lvm allows you to make a snapshot of the pool. This is nice if you
> only have a small window between when your servers stop backing up and
> your users workstations start.
>
> xfs has a great tool called xfs_copy. This tool will automatically
> "freeze" your filesystem if you're on lvm. (hence it's good to do this
> on a snapshot) and then copy the fs to another block device. This is
> better for memory usage than rsync and better than dd as it doesn't
> have to copy empty parts of the disk. It could be used with a remote
> device with iSCSI, but since it copies all of the data every time,
> it's probably not a good idea. If you're just copying to a local disk
> it works great.
>
Is this any better than using clonezilla with an ext2/3/4 partition on
an lvm-snapshot? (my understanding is that clonezilla "knows" to skip
unallocated blocks).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|