|
Re: [BackupPC-users] Feature suggestion: more granular/flexible includes & excludes
2009-11-04 09:57:41
On Nov 4, 2009, at 9:48 AM, Tyler J. Wagner wrote: On Wednesday 04 November 2009 13:36:10 Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: Not true! Perhaps you didn't read (or at least quote) the rest of my
post which explained how it would all be done on the *server*, where
*after* files were transferred using the normal (untouched) transport
method, a single (potentially) compound Perl conditional statement
would be applied against any file matching the modified
include/exclude statement to determine whether or not to indeed add it
to the new file list. No conditional would be applied if you just
wanted to use the standard include/exclude logic.
OK, sounds possible. What is the use case?
I for one would be interested in the case where large files are open and being appended to for days at at time. I would like to exclude files based on a combination of size and age. For example...
Tony Schreiner
Biology Department Boston College
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|
