Holger Parplies wrote:
> ah, so you're actually having a problem. Up to this point I wasn't sure if you
> weren't just misinterpreting some figures.

No, he and I are seeing the same thing -- File::RsyncP is a real 
problem.  I get decent transfers with actual rsync, but File::RsyncP has 
some serious design issues (see my other post with profiling information 
titled "File::RsyncP issues").  Is the author of that module (Craig 
Barratt) still around and/or maintaining it?

If anyone is getting more than 10MB/s out of BackupPC rsyncd transfers, 
I would be quite surprised (and would like to know what the backup 
hardware was).
-- 
Jim Leonard (trixter AT oldskool DOT org)            http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project:           http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at     http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/