Amanda-Users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: amstatus error on 2.6.1

2009-02-26 07:44:58
Subject: Re: amstatus error on 2.6.1
From: stan <stanb AT panix DOT com>
To: Jean-Louis Martineau <martineau AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:42:50 -0500 
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 07:31:44AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
> Stan,
> 
> It's known bug, remove the line 1042.
> 
So, that element of the structure does not need to get aded to the
acumulation?

-- 
One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking
zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
programs.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Amanda and older clients, stan
Next by Date:  Re: amstatus error on 2.6.1, Jean-Louis Martineau
Previous by Thread:  Re: amstatus error on 2.6.1, Jean-Louis Martineau
Next by Thread:  Re: amstatus error on 2.6.1, Jean-Louis Martineau
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]