LTO-4 tapetype and blocksize
2008-10-21 12:28:10
Hi,
Just got a new HP LTO-4 tape drive and I've done some testing
to get a tapetype entry for it and I don't see much of a difference
between the default (32k) and higher values like 512k, 1024k and
2048k (see below). What are your experiences wrt to a specific choice
of a blocksize for such a drive?
Also: I have LTO-3 tapes written with a blocksize of 32k:
will I be able to extract data from them using a different blocksize?
./amtapetype -e 800G -f /dev/nst0
define tapetype unknown-tapetype {
comment "just produced by tapetype prog (hardware compression off)"
length 772096 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 95148 kps
}
./amtapetype -o -e 800G -b 512k -f /dev/nst0
define tapetype unknown-tapetype {
comment "just produced by tapetype prog (hardware compression on)"
length 772096 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 101807 kps
}
./amtapetype -o -e 800G -b 1024k -f /dev/nst0
define tapetype unknown-tapetype {
comment "just produced by tapetype prog (hardware compression on)"
length 772096 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 102261 kps
}
./amtapetype -o -e 800G -b 2048k -f /dev/nst0
define tapetype unknown-tapetype {
comment "just produced by tapetype prog (hardware compression on)"
length 772096 mbytes
filemark 0 kbytes
speed 102094 kps
}
regards,
jf
--
<° ><
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- LTO-4 tapetype and blocksize,
Jean-Francois Malouin <=
|
|
|