Amanda-Users

Re: Glibc versions

2008-08-08 06:34:51
Subject: Re: Glibc versions
From: stan <stanb AT panix DOT com>
To: "Dustin J. Mitchell" <dustin AT zmanda DOT com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 06:29:57 -0400
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 06:50:46PM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:27 PM, stan <stanb AT panix DOT com> wrote:
> > I am trying to build 2.6.0p1 on a Ubuntu machine. As far as I know this
> > machine is the latest version of Ubuntu. The configure script fails on the
> > check for glibc version 2.2.0 or newer. I am curious if this version of
> > glibc is so new that it would not be in the Ubuntu stable release yet?
> 
> Nope -- I think it was released in 1998.  They're up around 2.2.16 now.
> 
> Look at the end of the logging section of config.log -- often this is
> caused by path problems, or by a missing pkg-config.
> 
I forgot I was working on Linux. I had not installed the -dev version of
the package :-( Stupid rookie mistake.

Thanks.

-- 
One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking
zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
programs.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>