Re: dump faster then tar ?
2007-07-12 11:02:04
Tx again,
All servers are Redhat Enterprise Linux (3,4,5).
The server is a RHEL5 with amanda-2.5.0p2
Clients are : amanda-2.4.5p1
Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
>
>
> FM wrote:
>> Hello,
>> one of my partition have more then 100 GB of html files inside a folder.
>> I am using tar because we want to exclude some folders next to the huge
>> one. Tar is taking hours to stats (?) all files inside the big folder.
>>
>> Could it be faster if I create a new partition for this big folder and
>> the use dump to backup the partition?
>
> It might also be helpful to know your operating system and software
> versions. On some systems dump is broken. On Solaris, ufsdump works and
> is fast.
>
>
> ---------------
>
> Chris Hoogendyk
>
> -
> O__ ---- Systems Administrator
> c/ /'_ --- Biology & Geology Departments
> (*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center
> ~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst
> <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
>
> ---------------
> Erdös 4
>
>
|
|
|