Amanda-Users

Re: dump faster then tar ?

2007-07-12 11:02:04
Subject: Re: dump faster then tar ?
From: FM <dist-list AT LEXUM.UMontreal DOT CA>
To: Mailing List Amanda User <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:09:16 -0400
Tx again,
All servers are Redhat Enterprise Linux (3,4,5).
The server is a RHEL5 with amanda-2.5.0p2
Clients are  : amanda-2.4.5p1



Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
> 
> 
> FM wrote:
>> Hello,
>> one of my partition have more then 100 GB of html files inside a folder.
>> I am using tar because we want to exclude some folders next to the huge
>> one. Tar is taking hours to stats (?) all files inside the big folder.
>>
>> Could it be faster if I create a new partition for this big folder and
>> the use dump to backup the partition?
> 
> It might also be helpful to know your operating system and software
> versions. On some systems dump is broken. On Solaris, ufsdump works and
> is fast.
> 
> 
> ---------------
> 
> Chris Hoogendyk
> 
> -
>   O__  ---- Systems Administrator
>  c/ /'_ --- Biology & Geology Departments
> (*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center
> ~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst
> <hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
> 
> ---------------
> Erdös 4
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>