After a long time, I've finally gotten approval to proceed with building
a centralized backup server. I've had the configuration and pricing set
for a while, but need to check and confirm everything before proceeding.
I'm interested in whether anyone on the list has any experience or
comments on my choice of tape changer, or comments on issues related to
how it is configured and potential modes of upgrading (adding another
tape drive, adding another changer, etc.)
I have a number of hand-me-down Sun Enterprise 250 servers. So, that is
my base. Dual UltraSPARC processor, 2G memory. I'm going to add a dual
channel Ultra-SCSI PCI card, and configure it with two 73G internal
drives for system and mirror/live upgrade and two 300G internal drives
for Amanda to use for scratch/disk backup space (all Seagate Cheetah).
The installation is Solaris 9. I'm already playing with it on a single
"old" 36G drive.
The tape changer I'm looking at is the Sony StorStation AIT Library
LIB-162/A4. It is a carousel rather than a robot. It holds 16 tapes
(3.2TB native, anybody's guess compressed) and can have a second tape
drive added. It is significantly less expensive than the expandable
robot systems I was looking at. Also, in the "expandable" systems,
adding the expansions was very expensive. So, I'm not sure what
advantage I would have been buying in the original box. With the Sony
system, I would just buy another and stack them (even stick it on a
separate SCSI bus). Amanda seems to be flexible enough that I can just
configure it to work with both. Seems to me like a no-brainer, as though
it's really the marketing folks who are pushing the more expensive
robotic systems. Price has been a significant issue in moving this
project forward.
I will get an APC Smart UPS 1500 to connect the whole setup.
I have a handful of other E250 servers that will be backed up by this
system over a 100MB network. We will initially not build any sort of
backside network for backing up. If it is important, we may later. The
servers have been added to over the years by various research labs in
the department and have external disk cabinets with various disks from
18G, 73G, 146G to 300G. I may end up with a basic Amanda configuration
and some additional archival configurations for different labs. The
total disk space used appears to be in the range of a few hundred
gigabytes at present, although it fluctuates a lot and is constantly
growing, usually gradually but with periodic surges.
At present we have DAT3 drives on almost all our servers and run tapes
almost every night using a tapewriter script that I wrote to handle
snapshots, tunnel through ssh across the network if necessary, and use a
configuration file. We'll phase that out when the amanda system gets
running. I've been looking at all options for backup software,
including bacula and amanda. At the moment, I just feel more comfortable
with amanda for a variety of reasons.
I would appreciate any feedback and comments on my configuration and
choice of tape changer.
TIA
---------------
Chris Hoogendyk
-
O__ ---- Systems Administrator
c/ /'_ --- Biology & Geology Departments
(*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center
~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst
<hoogendyk AT bio.umass DOT edu>
---------------
Erdös 4
|
