Amanda-Users

amreport reports wrong results

2006-12-07 20:26:19
Subject: amreport reports wrong results
From: René Kanters <rkanters AT richmond DOT edu>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:55:53 -0500
Hi,

I just tried the amreport command and it looks like it is not providing the proper result.
The email it generated was that the results were missing for every client and in the summary the line I kept is was repeated for every client too.
I checked and indeed there is no log file in the location it is looking for. There are files of the format log.20061206004500.0, so could this have something to do with the fact that I am using 'usetimestamps' in amanda.conf?

*** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY!

The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape.
The next new tape already labelled is: DAILY-1.

FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
  werner.richmond.edu   /home/rene    RESULTS MISSING
[snip]
  hartree.richmond.edu  /home/amanda  RESULTS MISSING
  amreport: ERROR could not open log /usr/local/etc/amanda/daily/log: No such file or directory


STATISTICS:
                          Total       Full      Incr.
                        --------   --------   --------
Estimate Time (hrs:min)    0:00
Run Time (hrs:min)         0:00
Dump Time (hrs:min)        0:00       0:00       0:00
Output Size (meg)           0.0        0.0        0.0
Original Size (meg)         0.0        0.0        0.0
Avg Compressed Size (%)     --         --         --
Filesystems Dumped            0          0          0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)         --         --         --

Tape Time (hrs:min)        0:00       0:00       0:00
Tape Size (meg)             0.0        0.0        0.0
Tape Used (%)               0.0        0.0        0.0
Filesystems Taped             0          0          0

Chunks Taped                  0          0          0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)     --         --         --

DUMP SUMMARY:
                                       DUMPER STATS               TAPER STATS
HOSTNAME     DISK        L ORIG-kB  OUT-kB  COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s MMM:SS   KB/s
-------------------------- ------------------------------------- -------------
albert.richm -ome/amanda   MISSING -------------------------------------------
[snip]
werner.richm /home/rene    MISSING -------------------------------------------

(brought to you by Amanda version 2.5.1p1)

I assume that the dump itself worked properly since amdump sent me the email (with similar snipping):
These dumps were to tape DAILY-14.
The next tape Amanda expects to use is: a new tape.
The next new tape already labelled is: DAILY-1.


STATISTICS:
                          Total       Full      Incr.
                        --------   --------   --------
Estimate Time (hrs:min)    0:00
Run Time (hrs:min)         0:00
Dump Time (hrs:min)        0:00       0:00       0:00
Output Size (meg)          33.3       33.3        0.0
Original Size (meg)       110.9      110.9        0.0
Avg Compressed Size (%)    30.0       30.0        --
Filesystems Dumped           11         11          0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s)      2366.8     2366.8        --

Tape Time (hrs:min)        0:00       0:00       0:00
Tape Size (meg)            33.3       33.3        0.0
Tape Used (%)              33.3       33.3        0.0
Filesystems Taped            11         11          0

Chunks Taped                  0          0          0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  1738.2     1738.2        --

USAGE BY TAPE:
  Label          Time      Size      %    Nb    Nc
  DAILY-14       0:00    34080k   33.3    11     0

NOTES:
  planner: Adding new disk werner.richmond.edu:/home/rene.
[snip]
  taper: tape DAILY-14 kb 34080 fm 11 [OK]

DUMP SUMMARY:
                                       DUMPER STATS               TAPER STATS
HOSTNAME     DISK        L ORIG-kB  OUT-kB  COMP%  MMM:SS   KB/s MMM:SS   KB/s
-------------------------- ------------------------------------- -------------
albert.richm -ome/amanda 0   10770    2624   24.4    0:00 5554.3   0:00 5498.7
[snip]
werner.richm /home/rene  0    1970    1920   97.5    0:00 9078.8   0:05  367.7

(brought to you by Amanda version 2.5.1p1)

Is this a bug in amreport, or does it have to do with some new features (e.g. usetimestamp) whose ramifications is not implemented throughout the suite of programs?

Thanks,
René

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • amreport reports wrong results, René Kanters <=